Ram Jagadeesh's film, "Court-State vs. A Nobody," currently streaming on Netflix, has an undeniable essence, but it's far removed from reality. In courtroom dramas, logic, reasoning, and reality are sometimes set aside to make the narrative more thrilling and entertaining. But I felt "Court-State vs. A Nobody" was too idealistic in its approach, so much so that the twists and turns seemed too predictable.
Also, there was a point in the film where, while I loved the drama and the wit of the dialogues and performances, respectively, I wanted to scream at the top of my lungs that this is not how court proceedings play out. Moreover, I felt the protagonist defeated his opponent, who was supposedly the most powerful man in the village, too easily.
Director: Ram Jagadeesh
Writers: Ram Jagadeesh, Vamsidhar Sirigiri, Karthikeya Sreenivass
Stars: Priyadarshi Pulikonda, Harsh Roshan, Sri Devi
I expected his nemesis to resist and go to any lengths to save his reputation, considering he was the master of the entire system. Well, I'd say "Court-State vs. a Nobody" is for you if you can put logic aside and simply enjoy the dramatic plot twists. If not, I recommend watching films like "The Trial of the Chicago 7," "A Few Good Men," and a spectacular 2014 release titled "Court."
Before we discover how Chandu, also known as Chandrasekhar, was sent to prison under the POCSO (Protection of Children from Sexual Offences) Act and other related charges, we need to understand the power dynamics that existed in and around his village, and the kind of man Mangapathi was. Mangapathi married the daughter of the village headman and, over time, began to dominate his entire family. No one could lift a finger without consulting Manga, not even his elderly father-in-law. In short, Manga was an influential criminal who had the entire police station at his command. He was very sensitive about maintaining his reputation and that of his family. He wouldn't let girls dress however they wanted, wouldn't let teenagers talk to boys, and even disliked girls coming home late. As I understand it, Manga's father-in-law had three sons.
entire family feared him, and even after knowing him for so many years, they didn't dare speak out against him. Jaabili was one of the granddaughters of Manga's father-in-law, Ramachandrayya, and she was the kind of girl who didn't hesitate to express her feelings. More than anything, Jaabili was a kind-hearted girl who probably believed that one day a Prince Charming would walk into her life and sweep her away. Jaabili fell in love with the son of a watchman, who lived right next to Jaabili's friend's house.
Jaabili, at first, made a prank call to irritate Chandu, but over time, the two developed feelings for each other. Jaabili didn't care whether he was the son of a security guard or a minister, because she knew he was a wonderful person inside and out. Jaabili often went to Chandu's house, but his own family had no idea what he was up to. Chaos erupted when Manga, thanks to security camera footage from a hotel called Sitara provided by one of his sycophants, learned that Jaabili would be meeting a boy from a disadvantaged background on the day of a marriage ceremony. Manga, with the help of the local police, framed Chandu for sexual abuse and ensured he remained in custody until the trial began.
During the trial, Chandu was not granted bail because his lawyer, Siva Rama, had been bought off by Manga and his lawyer, Damu. Siva didn't even blink before selling his conscience, and Chandu's disadvantaged family realized that his lawyer wasn't even trying to get him out of jail. One day, a relative of Chandu met a star lawyer named Mohan Rao, who had a reputation for never losing a case.
They decided to see Mohan Rao, but after carefully analyzing the details, he decided not to take the case. The problem was that Chandu's relatives had contacted Mohan Rao just days before the judge was due to pronounce the final judgment. Moreover, no lawyer wanted to argue a case related to the POCSO Act. But then came an unexpected turn in the Court-State vs. Nobody case, as Rao's junior, Surya Teja, decided to take the case without informing him. Teja had been trying for a long time to get his first independent case, but Rao never gave him the chance. This time, Teja knew that if he won the case, it could boost his career and prove his worth. First, Teja requested a retrial, and fortunately, the judge agreed. Teja, one by one, proved in court that all the witnesses presented by the prosecution twisted the facts and presented a false picture.
Comments
Post a Comment